Election of LegCo, a firm step towards quality democracy in Hong Kong: Global Times editorial
Chinese national flags and regional flags of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region are seen in Hong Kong on October 1, 2021 Photo: CFP
The seventh election of the Legislative Council (LegCo) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) was successfully held on Sunday. A total of 153 candidates from all walks of life, with different political views, contested for 90 seats. Among them are experienced politicians, talented young people, academics, accountants, lawyers, construction workers, bus drivers and “Hong Kong vagabonds”, which makes the election very representative.
This is the first LegCo election since the central government reformed the Hong Kong SAR electoral system in March. The new electoral system fully implements the âpatriots ruling Hong Kongâ standard. By putting in place strict legal standards and qualifying exams, the system robs members of the radical opposition LegCo who are ready to serve as pawns for outside forces, the opportunity to turn LegCo into an anti-base. Chinese.
Meanwhile, the number of members for the seventh term of Hong Kong SAR LegCo will increase from 70 to 90, and the members will be elected by the electoral committee constituency, functional constituencies and geographic constituencies. This aims to ensure that all social classes and constituencies are represented in the legislature, which is highly representative and politically inclusive, ensuring equal participation and fair competition.
Hong Kong people voted in an orderly fashion and the process went smoothly on Sunday. Each candidate participated in active campaigns. It reminds many of the district council elections held in November 2019. At that time, violence cast a shadow over Hong Kong. Many pro-establishment members of LegCo have been threatened, harassed or even attacked. Today, two years have passed and Hong Kong has turned the page.
Voters line up outside a polling station in Whampoa in Hong Kong to vote for the Legislative Council, the first election since the city implemented electoral reform that ensures that only patriots rule Hong Kong. Photo: Xinhua
If we compare the past and the present, we can clearly tell what kind of LegCo Hong Kong needs and which direction Hong Kong democracy should go. Hong Kong SAR Chief Executive Carrie Lam spoke about her expectations of LegCo in a recent interview with the Global Times.
She said she hopes the Hong Kong people ‘s demands can be passed on to LegCo. Meanwhile, LegCo can perform its function of amending laws and reviewing budgets under the Basic Law. Finally, LegCo can supervise the work of administrative bodies.
Frankly, these three expectations should be the responsibility of LegCo. Lam expressed his hopes because the previous LegCo failed to fulfill all three responsibilities. Some members of LegCo have even engaged in inciting chaos and riots.
For example, just after the 2019 protests, forces advocating mutual destruction offered to seize more than half of the seats in LegCo to veto all government plans to cripple the country’s campaign strategies. government. Some members of the extreme opposition have deliberately made a fuss to prevent LegCo from officially functioning.
Hong Kong and the people of Hong Kong are fed up with these people trying to destabilize Hong Kong and China under the banner of “democracy”. The Hong Kong National Security Law passed in 2020 and the new electoral system adopted in 2021 will indicate the direction of democracy in Hong Kong. Integrating patriotism into the democratic process serves the goal of good governance in Hong Kong and the fundamental interests of Hong Kong’s more than 7 million people.
It is certainly and naturally something that some American and Western forces do not want to see. Only a chaotic Hong Kong matches their national interests. Long before this LegCo election, propaganda machines in the United States and the West had stepped up their efforts to smear the elections and even illegally incite some Hong Kong people to vote as invalid. Such blatant interference in an election is the invasive behavior that the United States and Western countries often use to criticize other countries and regions. Now they are targeting Hong Kong with such tactics, which expose their true intent and hypocrisy.
Candidates attend the 2021 Legislative Council General Election Committee Constituency Candidates Forum on December 17 at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Center ahead of the December 19 election. Photo: AFP
After the vote began, opinion agencies in the United States and the West increased turnout, which is just an attempt to create a speech trap. It should be emphasized that participation is never the only benchmark for measuring whether a society is democratic and whether it functions normally. In 2020, when former President Donald Trump and incumbent President Joe Biden vied for the leadership of the United States, the turnout was the highest in 120 years, but those rates were driven by serious political divisions and a intense political confrontation. Shortly after the election, the Capitol Hill bombings took place, shaming American-style democracy to the greatest extent.
The key to whether or not a system is truly democratic is that the people have the final say. This LegCo election attracted more candidates in each procedure. Combining the two key values ââof patriotism and democracy and solving the economy and livelihood issues in Hong Kong is what Hong Kong people really need. After the election, Hong Kong’s legislative and administrative bodies should coordinate better, so that the Hong Kong government can govern effectively and better serve the well-being of Hong Kong’s 7 million people.
On July 1, 2019, rioters destroyed the LegCo complex, eclipsing democracy and the rule of law in Hong Kong. On December 19, 2021, the re-election of LegCo is a firm step towards good democracy and the rule of law in Hong Kong.