Biden’s plan to end Title 42 border rules blocked by judge

Immigration, border
Members of a Central American caravan who have spent weeks traveling through Mexico walk from Mexico to the U.S. side of the border April 29, 2018 in Tijuana, Baja California Norte, Mexico. |

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Biden administration from ending Title 42 restrictions enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic aimed at limiting asylum seekers who can seek protection at the U.S.-Brazilian border. Mexico.

Trump-appointed Judge Robert Summerhays granted a movement for a temporary restraining order preventing the Biden administration from lifting Title 42 rules issued under the Trump administration in March 2020. A lawsuit against the administration’s plan has been filed by Missouri, Louisiana and arizona.

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt announcement the restraining order on Monday.

The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention has implemented the measure limit the number of asylum seekers seeking protection at the US-Mexico border. But the CDC announcement its decision to end the order on April 1, with the Biden administration intending to implement the termination on May 23.

“Today the Court announced its intention to grant a temporary restraining order in the Missouri, Louisiana and Arizona lawsuit against the Biden administration for their planned suspension of Title 42,” wrote Schmitt. “This temporary restraining order should keep Title 42 in place until further legal proceedings, a critical victory for border security and the rule of law. My office will continue to fight to secure the border and protect the Missourians.”

Former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Tom Homan, who is now a visiting fellow at the conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, told the Christian Post that the judge’s ruling was “the right move for the protection of health in this country.

Homan believes Title 42 has been “very successful” in preventing the spread of COVID-19 and improving border security.

“The truth is that we want to prevent fewer infections from coming to the United States, but also give Border Patrol a more operational capability because when they close the borders, fewer people come in, and that means Border Patrol … can more than hold the line, they are vigilant, to protect our national security,” the former Trump administration official said.

Several Democrats have expressed opposition to lifting the directive on public health, including the senses. Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly. Like Call reported, the senators wrote in a March 24 letter to President Joe Biden that while Title 42 “should not be in effect indefinitely,” it should remain in place until the administration implements a better plan to deal with migrant applications.

The senators warned that abruptly ending a policy without a clear plan to replace it “would greatly increase the pressure on [Department of Homeland Security]border communities and local non-profit organizations that are already close or at full capacity. »

The senators also argue that the administration failed to communicate with local government and community leaders in Arizona about the policy changes.

Last month when I spoke to journalistsSen. Joe Manchin, DW.V., also voiced his opposition to the lifting of Title 42.

“If anything, we should consider tenure on Title 42,” he said. “Maybe that would inspire us to have a good immigration policy that works for Americans and to secure our borders – borders have to be secure,” he said.

The progressive legal organization American Civil Liberties Union claimed March 29 statement that he believes Title 42 has been “misused as a border enforcement tool”.

“Our government has the tools it needs to safely screen people at the border, as required by our laws, to determine if they are eligible for asylum or other humanitarian protections,” wrote the group. “The CDC should resist any political interference from the White House and end Title 42 in its entirety.”

The CDC had voted to extend the order for Title 42 in late January due to an increase in COVID-19 cases caused by the omicron variant. Last March, the CDC delayed the implementation of a Title 42 rescission order until May 23 to allow Homeland Security to prepare for a dramatic increase in border crossings in the coming months.

According to federal statistics Submitted to federal court earlier this month, DHS reported 221,303 total encounters on the Southwest Border in March. Like CBS News the government reported 1.7 million evictions under Title 42 last month.

Comments are closed.