Donate to MCF

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

The Firing Of Sue Black

Milwaukee County was abuzz Thursday with the news that Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele had fired Parks Director Sue Black.  When Abele first decided to keep Black on as the director of the park system, and then gave her a substantial raise to keep her from moving on to a job in Chicago, everyone thought that she was in that position for as long as Abele was county executive.

Bruce Murphy, writing for Urban Milwaukee, described the firing as a “stunning development” and gave the following description of the course of events Thursday afternoon:

County Supervisor Jason Haas says he entered the county courthouse at the same time as Black at around 12:45 p.m Thursday afternoon, and they chatted a bit. “We were at the front desk of the the county board chambers. That was the last time I saw her.”

About 15 minutes later, Haas says, Abele sent an email to board members saying Sue Black no longer works with the county. Haas was stunned. Black told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel she was there to attend her regular weekly meeting with Abele and he told her “we are going in a another direction. We are letting you go.”

Black said she was locked out of her office in Wauwatosa while she was at the courthouse meeting with Abele.  Her county cellphone was soon cut off. Sources say police were called to escort her from the office. Attempts to reach Black at her job at the parks office were unsuccessful. “She’s not here. She’s no longer employed here,” the person answering the phone said, adding that he had no other phone number for her.

County Board Supervisors Gerry Broderick, Steve Taylor and Mark Borkowski as well as Chairwoman Marina Dimitirijevic, were in an uproar demanding to know the reasonwhy Abele fired Black.  The Park People issued a statement thanking Black for her years of service and also wondered why she was fired.

Sue Black

Some members of the public were so outraged by what they perceived as a travesty, they have started an online petition demanding that Abele rehire Black.

The reason for the puzzlement and outrage over the firing of Sue Black is based on the perception that she was an effective parks director.  They cite the “prestigious” 2009 National Gold Medal for Excellence from the National Recreation and Park Association.  Many have credited Black for doing the most that she could do with an ever dwindling budget.  Others, like the Park People, have lauded Black for her fostering private/public partnerships with companies such as Miller and Harley-Davidson.

While Milwaukee County Courthouse insiders have to told Milwaukee County First that there were many reasons behind Black’s firing, there appears to be a smoking gun which might have been the last straw.

Channel 58 in Milwaukee is reporting that there is some suspect aspects of the lease for Crystal Ridge in Franklin which could end up costing Milwaukee County taxpayers millions of dollars.  The wording of the contract is such that the operator of the ridge basically gets to call all the shots and the county is on the hook for the bill.  It has been described as pure corporate welfare, whereas the private agency stands to reap all the benefit, but the taxpayers are liable for any loss.

It should be noted that the news service is reporting that it is not clear if Black or the supervisors were unaware of the ramifications or merely ignored it.  The fact is that at least one supervisor, John Weishan, was openly questioning of this clause as well as others, and was opposed to the contract because of them.

But that is not the only reason why Black deserved to be terminated.

The reasons that people thought so highly of Black and her job performance was nothing more than a veneer to cover up the truth.  Likewise, some of the reasons people have praised her are the same reasons they should be applauding her firing.

The Gold Medal award, which was so highly touted by Scott Walker during his gubernatorial campaign, is a thin layer of veneer trying to hide the shambles that the parks district has become.

While it is sadly true that the subsequent administrations over the past three decades have continuously cut the amount of funding and staffing for the parks department, Black did not help matters.  Instead of using her dwindling resources to maintain the parks, she paid no less than ten people in her administration executive grade salaries.  As a result of her misplaced focus of funds on her cronies, the parks have accumulated nearly $300,000,000 in deferred maintenance and neglected repairs, causing many eyesores of our once great park system.  Things had gotten so bad that some park bathrooms had to be closed because they were unsafe.  The shortage of staff had caused such a back lag in trash pick up that it made the news twice.

Furthering the problem is that Black would often focus an inordinate amount of staff and funding to certain parks, such as the lake front and the suburban parks in the more affluent areas while giving short shrift to inner city parks.

Black’s active pursuit of private/public partnerships was also a path fraught with peril.  MCF had warned of the dangers three years ago, citing the course of events in New York City’s experience with this ill-conceived agenda:

When New York began relying on public-private parks partnerships following the fiscal crisis of the seventies, the idea was that private philanthropic groups would pick up the slack. And they did. Groups like the Central Park Conservancy, the Prospect Park Alliance, and the Bryant Park Corporation rose to respond to that crisis. But the city’s newest parks, paid for and operated largely by nonpublic dollars, are girded tightly by their private patrons.

The High Line was invented as a park by Friends of the High Line, which raised $44 million in donations and helped select the design. Celebrity endorsements (Edward Norton, Diane Von Furstenberg), caps on visitor attendance, adjacent real-estate development, and a dense police presence compared to other parks have all contributed to the appearance of something less than fully public. Elsewhere, the Parks Department has met with a local interest group called Coalition for a Better Washington Square Park, which offered to hire its own security and maintenance forces for the newly renovated green. Parks turned them down but did “discuss the designs of the next phase of renovation.” And in order to build the $350 million Brooklyn Bridge Park, the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, a public agency, is using the private developers of luxury condos like One Brooklyn Bridge Park to pay for the maintenance of its public front yard (never mind what’ll happen if the condos don’t sell).

Expect more of the same. “What’s happening on a basic level is that the city does not feel that parks are its responsibility anymore,” says Geoffrey Croft, president of NYC Park Advocates. “But every community deserves to have healthy parks, not just ones that have wealthy benefactors.”

In summary, the firing of Sue Black was something long overdue and well-deserved, especially in light of the scandalous Crystal Ridge deal.  In fact, there was sufficient reason for Abele not to have kept her in his administration in the first place.

The fact that he had kept her on board in the first place does raise another question which deserves further study and a watchful eye.  It must be kept in mind that Abele is a member of the Greater Milwaukee Committee, which has an agenda of systematically dismantling Milwaukee County government.  Part of this agenda includes spinning off the parks system to be controlled by its own authority.

As Abele took the bold, if highly controversial, step of protecting the taxpayers by firing the very popular Black for this irresponsible contract and other reasons, we hope that he will take equally bold steps to ensure that the parks system stays intact and remains the property of the public.

18 comments to The Firing Of Sue Black

  • You continue to try to make the point that Black directed money to “executive grade salaries” (you have yet to explain how much that is exactly) and that resulted in the $300 million in deferred maintenance. That’s a ridiculous claim on so many levels, it’s hard to get to them all. (The $300 million was accumulated only during her tenure as director??? $300 million earmarked for parks was spent on “executive” salaries and diverted by her??)

    About Crystal Ridge, you seem to also be completely missing the point that Sue Black didn’t vote to approve it. The County Board did that. Corporation Counsel also vetted the contract. Where’s the damning language for them? She may be culpable, but so is everyone else.

    Your intent of laying a lot of blame with a single person completely ignores how things actually work.

    • Chris Liebenthal

      Oh, it wouldn’t have made up for the entire loss. Everyone knows that. But the extra 20 workers could have at least kept up with the trash.

      As for Crystal Ridge, Sue was misrepresenting not only the contract, but also the county exec’s position regarding it. And they’re reporting that the contract didn’t get a proper vetting due to Sue putting pressure on her friends on the board to ram it through.

      You’re denial of Sue’s involvement on this shows your bias.

      • The County Board cut Parks Maintenance Works I and II positions in 2009 and 2010. Those are the people who “keep up with trash”. I opposed those cuts in public on numerous occasions (and even got some of them restored), as I have done anytime the parks budget has been on the block.

        Again, the Board voted on Crystal Ridge, not a director. No matter how much “pressure” she put on them, it was still their vote.

        What amount of pay is an “executive grade salary”? You keep launching that one, but can’t or won’t define it. If nothing else, just answer that very simple question.

        • Chris Liebenthal

          Really? So it’s the Board’s fault that she misrepresented the facts? She has no responsibility for her behaviors at all?

          As for the salary grades, it’s all part of the county code. That’s the way things are done.

          But cheer up, Dan. Crystal Ridge is not the only reason she was fired.

        • Chris Liebenthal

          Dan, since you are now deleting comments on your site, perhaps you will answer the question here: Why was the parks commission disbanded in the first place, especially if it was doing a such a good job such as you reported?

  • Copy Editor

    Please correct:
    In “They site the “prestigous” 2009 National Gold Medal. . .” should be “cite”
    In ” Many have accredited Black for . . . ” should be “credited”

  • Copy Editor

    Also please correct: “prestigous” should be prestigious”

  • Joseph Topp

    The developer at Crystal Ridge is a health care developer with no experience in developing a baseball complex. Seemed a little smelly from the start,

  • County Board supervisor John Weishan is a socialist moron. The Crystal Ridge deal is fantastic for the County. A local businessman from the Franklin is putting up $3.5 million of his own money to do the first two phases of the project which includes 4 adult baseball diamonds and 4 little league diamonds. He is doing this to help Franklin and the area. He’s unlikely to profit for years.

    If Franklin and the Co want to develop the site more he’s willing to put in about another 50%. The County and Franklin get an increasing percentage of revenue on a 25 year lease. Weishan has been ridiculously wrong on almost everything he has said and done in his term. It is time to oust him and Abele needs to be right behind.

  • Kitty Gunsmoke

    The Greater Milwaukee Committee connection bothers me greatly – !

    What can you tell us, Capper, about the 2nd in command who was appointed today to Black’s position? Many thanks for all you do!

  • Chris

    What $10m? The new developer is willing to put in up to $7m of the possible $10m full project, including the first $3.5m for the front end of the project which includes ski hill renovations and 8 ball diamonds.

    If you are referring to what the old developer is claiming, that is on the County in any case at some point, that’s another dumb (and possible dishonest) thing done under Ament or Walker. Does it make sense to not do a good project now, especially given that $7m is coming from a local citizen trying to do good?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6uBEQsod4A&feature=plcp

    • Chris Liebenthal

      The old contract which includes the ten million dollars was on a year to year basis approved by Black. Because it was year to year, it did not need approval of the Board.

      As for your singing the praises of the new manager, it’s easy to talk big when you know that your potential losses will be covered by the taxpayers, isn’t it?

  • She won’t be missed. One monkey don’t stop no show. They can find another monkey. She is a rude person, and what goes around, comes around. Bet on it!

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>